Outrage at Australian man’s requires G-string bikinis to be banned on the Gold Coast

Space-Separated Links URL URL URL URL Space-Separated Links URL URL URL URL Space-Separated Links url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url


Australians have been divided over a name to ban G-string bikinis on Australian seashores, with many labelling the transfer “sexist”.

The fierce debate erupted after long-time group employee Ian Grace pleaded for Tom Tate, the Mayor of the Gold Coast, to ban the skimpy swimwear in a letter printed by the Gold Coast Bulletin on Saturday.

Mr Grace, the 2022 Gold Coast Volunteer of the 12 months, defined he was determined for girls to “cowl up” because the tiny tog pattern left him feeling “uncomfortable”.

Detailing an incident during which a girl, who was apparently “as near bare as anybody could possibly be” had walked previous him just lately, Mr Grace claimed he “inadvertently” checked out her, writing that whereas it was “a pleasing view” she was sending the “flawed message”.

“At a neighborhood occasion the place our musicians had been enjoying, one younger woman specifically was strolling on the footpath on the principle street and had the tiniest triangle in entrance and was as near bare as anybody could possibly be,” Mr Grace wrote.

“You could possibly see she was wanting nearly defiantly at individuals as they approached, nearly daring them to say one thing. There’s one thing very flawed right here.

“Whereas any man would get pleasure from ‘the view’, I consider girls are very a lot demeaning and cheapening themselves, portraying themselves as intercourse objects, then decrying it when males see them that method.

“Naked bums will be seen to be each bit as erotic if no more so, than girls’s naked breasts – so would it not not make sense they’re banned identically? If not banned on the seashore, very positively banned the second they’re off the seashore.

“This definitely shouldn’t be allowed in public swimming pools or theme/water parks that are very way more household oriented. Younger children don’t must see girls’s bums.”

Mr Grace mentioned the issue wasn’t simply unique to bikinis at seashores, but in addition lamented at “skin-tight” activewear, which he’d run into at espresso outlets and different public venues.

“Innocently I admired a shapely naked bum on the seashore, and was greatly surprised and felt uncomfortable when that very same younger woman was later serving me espresso,” he penned.

“I nearly felt like I had inadvertently violated her privateness.

“It additionally goes removed from the seashore and bikinis, while you have a look at the ‘crevice filler’ outfits girls put on, whether or not exercising or simply out and about. When strolling behind girls with these skin-tight outfits, you may see each single motion of every buttock – a pleasing view, however is that this not the flawed message?”

Understandably, Mr Grace’s plea has angered many, notably girls who argued on Fb his gripe was “sexist” and “outdated”.

“Wow 2024, and nonetheless being shamed for our our bodies,” one lady said.

“Can we ask males to put on shirts too then?” another person mused, declaring the apparent double commonplace.

As one other scoffed: “That is so blatantly sexist and outdated. This wasn’t the flex Ian thought it was.

Many males too had been additionally towards Mr Grace’s bikini ban, labelling the concept “silly”.

“That’s the stupidest concept I’ve ever heard in my whole life,” one argued.

“To every their very own, in the event that they want to put on a thong, we’ve got no points with it,” one other shared.

As one bloke scoffed: “Can’t individuals simply get on with their life’s (sic) with out getting upset over the stupidest issues?”

There have been some although who claimed they “should agree” with Mr Grace’s opinion, labelling the skimpy swimwear pattern “consideration searching for”.