Household of Wallabies star Kurtley Beale’s accuser give proof of alleged Bondi intercourse assault

A girl who alleges she was sexually assaulted by Wallabies star Kurtley Beale within the rest room flew interstate to buy a marriage gown hours later, a courtroom has heard.

Beale, 35, is dealing with a jury trial at Sydney’s Downing Centre Court docket after pleading not responsible to sexual activity with out consent and two counts of sexual touching.

Police allege Mr Beale groped the lady’s backside on the Seashore Highway bar in Bondi on December 17, 2022, earlier than forcing her into oral intercourse in a stall within the males’s rest room.

The jury had been informed the 29-year-old flew as much as Queensland the next day.

The lady informed her mother-in-law to-be “Kurtley (Beale) adopted me into the bathroom and pinned me towards the wall and tried to have intercourse with me”.

In her proof, the mother-in-law mentioned the lady had informed her fiance “one thing actually bizarre occurred” and he was flying up early to be together with her.

The mother-in-law drove the lady to a police station the place she made a press release to police. On the best way, she additional described the allegation.

“She mentioned ‘He (Beale) was pissed. I don’t suppose he’d bear in mind … he may hardly rise up, and was pinching me on the arse all evening,” the mother-in-law mentioned.

The lady later added after leaving that “he tried to place his dick in my mouth”, to which her mother-in-law replied: “Why didn’t you chew the f**king factor?”

The jury heard proof from 5 members of the couple’s households on Monday concerning the lady’s earliest allegations, together with her mom and father.

They described her as being “frazzled” and breaking down in tears through the morning after the alleged incident, whereas her father mentioned she was in “psychological anguish”.

“There was concern on her face. Easy,” he mentioned. “She was holding again from not crying and couldn’t look me within the eye. For me, that’s psychological anguish on her half,” he mentioned.

The lady’s father informed the courtroom that her daughter had informed him throughout the identical dialog that she was “scared that due to (Beale’s) profile folks will hate us”.

Her mom gave proof that her daughter had alleged she was “sexually assaulted” and her first response was: “Why are you on the airplane? Why did you go?”

“She mentioned she needed to get away. She needed to course of what occurred. I used to be involved about her being away and having to take care of this with out us there,” the mom mentioned.

Underneath cross-examination, Beale’s barrister, Margaret Cunneen SC, grilled the witnesses about an argument between the lady and her fiance that week.

4 witnesses denied any information of the argument, with the lady’s father stating that she was joyful when the couple arrived in Sydney the evening earlier than.

Solely her sister mentioned there was a disagreement, nevertheless it wasn’t “critical”. A pal current on the evening gave proof there was “pressure” between the couple.

The 5 household witnesses additionally gave proof as to the order of occasions on the evening, together with claims opposite to CCTV that the lady entered the boys’s rest room first.

“She informed me, ‘I wanted to go to the toilet however left the cubicle unlocked. Somebody adopted me in and bought contained in the cubicle’,” the lady’s future sister-in-law mentioned.

“Somebody mentioned are you able to f**ok me? Are you able to f**ok me? He put his penis in my face … I pushed towards him and mentioned I’m engaged’. He mentioned, ‘Nicely f**ok off then’ and left’.”

In her proof, the lady claimed Beale had been “forceful” and “determined” and had requested for intercourse earlier than barging in on her within the males’s stall and locking the door.

In cross-examination, Ms Cunneen prompt to the lady she as an alternative was the one “in management” of the encounter and had used the allegation to get sympathy for her fiance.

An worker who entered the toilet through the alleged incident additionally gave proof they noticed a pair of males’s and ladies’s ft in a single stall however didn’t hear any noises.

The jury earlier heard proof from the lady’s fiance through the second week of the trial, who spoke concerning the pair’s relationship, and had been additionally proven CCTV footage.

The trial will proceed on Tuesday.

Related Articles

Back to top button